Originally posted by Dr. Stupid
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Close Encounters at the End of the World: THE THING PREQUEL
Collapse
X
-
You chose...poorly.
(it's just an indicator for those who have been lifelong devotees to the Carpenter film and are enthused by this repremakequel...though if anyone wishes to come forward with a tale of seduction ala The Red Shoe Diaries involving Brimley, a mead hall, and several barrels of confectioners sugar, then by all means)Last edited by Captain Russ; 07-14-2011, 04:29 PM.Me quick one want slow
Comment
-
It looks decent but, yeah, The Thing '82 is one of my favourite films and this looks too similar and too devoid of practical effects magic. As of now, though, I'm certainly curious.
The aspects that could potentially kill it is if they a) completely ruin the mystery of the creature; b) allow any character other than the dog to survive; and c) give the thing 'powers' it doesn't have come the start of Carpenter's film. One of the best aspects to the design in his version is that the lifeform was still learning to imitate over the course of the film. If its got all its skills honed to perfection and beyond by the close of play, then I'll call bullshit.I experienced an invasion of my mind by a transcendentally rational mind, as if I had been insane all my life and suddenly I had become sane.
Comment
-
Brimley gets around pretty well for a guy with diabeetus.
Anyway, I'll probably see this because Winsteadboner and it pretty much looks like Dean Cundey shot it."Here, young man, your hormones are raging. Let's go in this bedroom, and we'll engage in some homosexual acts. You'll find you like it." - Rep. Ken Peterson, R-Billings
"You're born alone and you die alone and this world just drops a bunch of rules on top of you to make you forget those facts. But I never forget. I'm living like there's no tomorrow, because there isn't one." - Don Draper
~*RATED BEST POSTER OF 2011 - CHIPOTLE FAN FORUMS*~
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ben Thomas View PostIt looks decent but, yeah, The Thing '82 is one of my favourite films and this looks too similar and too devoid of practical effects magic. As of now, though, I'm certainly curious.
The aspects that could potentially kill it is if they a) completely ruin the mystery of the creature; b) allow any character other than the dog to survive; and c) give the thing 'powers' it doesn't have come the start of Carpenter's film. One of the best aspects to the design in his version is that the lifeform was still learning to imitate over the course of the film. If its got all its skills honed to perfection and beyond by the close of play, then I'll call bullshit.
All of this. The original is in my top 3 of all time. This trailer was decent, but I'm hesitant."Looking like Nic Cage dressed in Kurt Cobain's closet. I mean that as a compliment" - BillyG
"Too cunty for wine bars, too dainty for real bars." - Anderson
Comment
-
or I could just watch 'The Thing' again and save $12.Originally posted by MartinWho the fuck is Kellan Lutz?Originally posted by gravediggerBasically what I'm saying is that, based on what I've watched so far, we should all listen to Matt more often.Originally posted by MartinAnd who the FUCK is Peaches Geldof?
Kellan Lutz's girlfriend?
Comment
-
I'm curious about it, don't get me wrong, but all the points Ben brought up are valid. And that's even with my love of MEW. I'll be there opening weekend, I just hope I'm not sorely disappointed."Looking like Nic Cage dressed in Kurt Cobain's closet. I mean that as a compliment" - BillyG
"Too cunty for wine bars, too dainty for real bars." - Anderson
Comment
Comment