Originally posted by Master Shake
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Emmys 2010
Collapse
X
-
"Looking like Nic Cage dressed in Kurt Cobain's closet. I mean that as a compliment" - BillyG
"Too cunty for wine bars, too dainty for real bars." - Anderson
-
It's easy to say Cranston is putting on better performances because he is more over the top, emotive, and has more OH SHIT kind of moments. Hamm's performance/character is closed off, cold, and inside of himself. I can definitely see enjoying Cranston more, but I wouldn't try to compare their acting performance side by side at all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BillyG View PostIt's easy to say Cranston is putting on better performances because he is more over the top, emotive, and has more OH SHIT kind of moments.he went from 'simpering coward' to 'magnificent bastard' in just under 2 sentences.
It takes skill to pull of a tonal shift like that.
Also, Giancarlo Esposito should have gotten Breaking Bad a second 'Supporting Actor' nod. His Gustavo Fring is one of the most menacing heavies I've seen on TV in awhile, and he plays him with an almost alien coolness.Last edited by Master Shake; 08-27-2010, 11:07 AM.sigpic
360: JohnnyChopsocky PSN: Stud_Beefpile
Comment
-
Originally posted by Abraham Smashington View PostTotally true. Segal brought it fucking hard on the last season of Sons. And Justified should have gotten a nod for Goggins (love that they kept him on).
Speaking with slight bit of inside knowledge, FX knows they get fucked at Awards Shows.
They can't explain, no one else can explain it. The only shows they've had to actually show place or win at the Emmy Awards or any major offering have been from the stuff they co-run with Sony.
Basically, if you're not Damages or Rescue Me...The Emmys doesn't want to have shit to do with you at FX.My readers come to me for my thoughts and opinions. I've built myself into a brand
Click here to visit AndersonVision!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uncle Ruckus View PostSpeaking with slight bit of inside knowledge, FX knows they get fucked at Awards Shows.
They can't explain, no one else can explain it. The only shows they've had to actually show place or win at the Emmy Awards or any major offering have been from the stuff they co-run with Sony.
Basically, if you're not Damages or Rescue Me...The Emmys doesn't want to have shit to do with you at FX.sigpic
360: JohnnyChopsocky PSN: Stud_Beefpile
Comment
-
Originally posted by Master Shake View PostSo the Emmys aren't just run by tasteless fucks, now there's a conspiracy too?
It's all political. They view FX as being a step above Spike which is shit, but they do it.
I guess you've got to be a bunch of pricks to win anything. Out of all the TV networks/channels, FX are always the nicest people.
They also don't have the budgets alloted to pimp their shows. SONY puts up the cash for Rescue Me and Damages.
FX gets whatever money is left over from pimping FOX shows.My readers come to me for my thoughts and opinions. I've built myself into a brand
Click here to visit AndersonVision!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Master Shake View PostHey, whatever keeps them pumping out the quality.
I am kinda glad 'Archer' is getting some acknowledgment of existence from the Emmys.
That was a fucking fluke. An impressive fluke, but one nonetheless.
On the animated subject, I'm just glad that they're realizing Adult Swim actually exists.
Robot Chicken pulling their first Emmy win was pretty impressive.My readers come to me for my thoughts and opinions. I've built myself into a brand
Click here to visit AndersonVision!
Comment
Comment