If Ultron needed to be 20 minutes longer, I'm the King of England.
Portrait of His Majesty, King Grave Digger the First, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and of His other Realms and Territories King, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.
I need to rewatch it, but I'm not saying Ultron is bad like say, Iron Man 2, but compared to Avengers 1, it's not very good. It's middle tier Marvel stuff. We all expected more of it. And 20 minutes chopped ain't enough for it to being good.
Ant-Man is better. That's what surprised me so much about it.
I don't know if it needed to be longer, but I don't get the hate. I liked Ultron. To say it was better than the first Avengers is madness, however.
Oh, I liked it a lot. I haven't rewatched it since the theater so maybe my opinion will change but I remember thinking it felt a lot longer than it was.
I need to rewatch it, but I'm not saying Ultron is bad like say, Iron Man 2, but compared to Avengers 1, it's not very good. It's middle tier Marvel stuff. We all expected more of it. And 20 minutes chopped ain't enough for it to being good.
Ant-Man is better. That's what surprised me so much about it.
Iron Man 2 has two amazing and fun performances. It gets undeserved shit for a bad plot, but fuck, they all have bad plots.
Comment