SPIDER-MAN, VENOM, NON MARVEL SPIDEY DOES WHAT A SPIDER CAN IF SONY LETS HIM

[B_Metal]

Fuck DC and their (mostly) unrealistic world/characters. Make mine Marvel!

Yes, because Marvel movies = so realistic. Lulz @ comic fanboyism

[Abraham Smashington]

Major Marvel characters tend to be a bit more realistic than DC characters. Seriously. Not a fanboy comment

[Howard]

Yes, because Marvel movies = so realistic. Lulz @ comic fanboyism

Where did I say Marvel was realistic? Certainly hands and shoulders over DC when it comes to realism though. Their characters are (more or less) grounded in the real world with real world problems. Definitely easier to relate to Marvel characters (for me).

[Howard]

Major Marvel characters tend to be a lot more realistic than DC characters. Seriously. Not a fanboy comment

Fixed.

Just look at Spider-Man.

[Abraham Smashington]

I can identify with a nerdy kid bit by a spider. I however cannot identify with a flying god. At least not anymore.

[B_Metal]

OK, so Blade, is he considered realistic or what? How about Ghost Rider? Come on people's it's not the realism that makes the Marvel properties better. It's been that MOST of them were just better movies, (not Ghost Rider) Last time I checked, the last Batmang flick was pretty badass and that's a DC property. And I guess you could argue "but his tech's is all realistic" if you wanted but I think the key to comic book movies working is less about realism and more about making a good movie that happens to be about comic book characters.

Although I will admit DC does have a shallow pool to pick from.

[Matt]

Robert Pattinson as Peter Parker. You know it's gonna happen.

[B_Metal]

Where did I say Marvel was realistic?

Fuck DC and their (mostly) unrealistic world/characters. Make mine Marvel!

I guess it seemed kind of implied but maybe I fails at teh engrish.

[Abraham Smashington]

Marvel movies > DC movies

FACT

[Howard]

]OK, so Blade, is he considered realistic or what? How about Ghost Rider? Come on people's it's not the realism that makes the Marvel properties better. It's been that MOST of them were just better movies, (not Ghost Rider) Last time I checked, the last Batmang flick was pretty badass and that's a DC property. And I guess you could argue "but his tech's is all realistic" if you wanted but I think the key to comic book movies working is less about realism and more about making a good movie that happens to be about comic book characters.

Although I will admit DC does have a shallow pool to pick from.

Those aren't even considered major Marvel characters. Hell, for the most part, they aren't a part of the normal Marvel continuity. Try again.

[Abraham Smashington]

DC movies would work perfectly in awesome CG.

[Howard]

I guess it seemed kind of implied but maybe I fails at teh engrish.

Implied that Marvel was more realistic than DC? Yes. Not that Marvel movies were realistic in general. Certainly more identifiable though.

[B_Metal]

Marvel movies > DC movies

FACT

So far that is truth.

Those aren't even considered major Marvel characters. Hell, for the most part, they aren't a part of the normal Marvel continuity. Try again.

How about X-Mangs, Fantastic 4, Hulk, Daredevil? that shit's realistic as hell huh Howard? The discussion wasn't about which characters were MAJOR ones, but more realistic. Try again.

[B_Metal]

I just think it's goofy to want realism from comic movies. Now the identifiable thing you mentioned? That's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more important.

[Abraham Smashington]

Each of those movies you listed deal with real world problems.

X-Men: Homosexuality
F4: 4times the Homosexuality
Hulk: Big Homosexuality
Daredevil: Blind Homosexuality