I love the comments at that link. It's like no one knows this movie is based on a fucking ultra violent comic. "Oh noes! It's so violent!" ""Boohoo, she's a child that swears!" FFS.
Martin, you need a better plan than that. Are you going to take Kick-Ass and make love to it, followed by an extreme molestation causing it to submit? If so, then I assume Kick Ass and you must already know each other due to the fact that Kick Ass was willing to have your child with no need for submissive maneuvers. So Kick Ass is so willing to trust you that Kick Ass lets you sleep with it AND not use any protection at all, thus impregnating it, then you decide, just for shits n giggles, to begin a molestation process so intense that Kick Ass is now in submission? But Kick Ass had already submitted to you once it agreed to allow you to place your uncovered penis into its fully fertile vagina! Martin, there is no need for the extra molestation step. Kick Ass is already yours.
Unless you just placed the steps backwards, and Kick Ass is a pure stranger to you that won't allow unprotected sex without unwanted submission. Then it kinda makes sense.
But I still have to ask, why impregnate it? That's going to lead to some horrific legal fees (as if the rape wasn't enough) and 18 years of child support.
The line seems aimed at adolescent boys. Not surprised it was written that way originally. They know their audience.
And Brits. Since Millar's one of 'em and Empire is one of their magazines (where the redband trailer was available), it would stand to reason...oh no I've gone " over analytical hygiene-challenged nerd" on this.
Comment