SPOILERZ ALL UP IN THIS BITCH
I wanted to split this out of the "what you watchin', fool" thread because I think it could be a good thread on it's own and so we don't have to use the spoiler tag for the entire discussion. Here's one post from Howard:
I had the same question about the lifespan of the clones. I figured it had something to do with cloning technology not being perfect, even in whatever year the movie takes place. But I'm also filling in the blanks on the front side by assuming the statis the unactivated clones sit in does not trigger the decay. Kind of like in the ALIEN universe where being in stasis doesn't cause you to age.
Then again, maybe the three year life is input by design based on some psychological study. I could see three years alone in a space station with only a robot with an eerie and detached voice as a friend wearing on your mental faculties.
Outside of the film being a chance for Rockwell to put on one hell of a performance, I think the ultimate point of the film is a comment on big business and industry. The mining company (sorry, I forget the name) basically commoditizes (new word?) human life. They put a dollar value and useful life limitation on an employee for the purposes of cutting as many costs as possible. And based on the last few minutes of the movie, the world where this takes place clearly still assigns great worth to human life. It's not like THE ISLAND.
One question I had- how did they decide to use Rockwell? Did he really do a stretch on the station and was so great that they chose to use him as a model for the clone attendants? And if so, did he know he was being cloned? I don't want to see a sequel but I'd love to see some kind of book or something filling in some of the backstory because I think it's so interesting.
I wanted to split this out of the "what you watchin', fool" thread because I think it could be a good thread on it's own and so we don't have to use the spoiler tag for the entire discussion. Here's one post from Howard:
Yeah, but it's a cellular decay that we see. Awakened or not, you should see that same cellular decay in the stored clones. We see the storage area. Not some kind of frozen sleep. Hmm. All at the same age. With no sign of cellular growth. Damnit. Which is why I go back to the something in the food that activates the cellular decay. Blah, blah, blah, studies have shown that greater than 3 years of "life" on the moon leads to mental breakdown/destruction of company property and thus the built in destruct with the introduction of a compound into the food/water source. Ehh, I'm over-analyzing a fairly tight film.
Then again, maybe the three year life is input by design based on some psychological study. I could see three years alone in a space station with only a robot with an eerie and detached voice as a friend wearing on your mental faculties.
An even bigger question? What was the point of the film? I'm not going to lead with my thoughts because I'm curious to hear some of yours.....
One question I had- how did they decide to use Rockwell? Did he really do a stretch on the station and was so great that they chose to use him as a model for the clone attendants? And if so, did he know he was being cloned? I don't want to see a sequel but I'd love to see some kind of book or something filling in some of the backstory because I think it's so interesting.
Comment